CONNECTOR

A Plaid sandbox alternative with coherent bank data.

Plaid's sandbox gives canned institutions. Fictix gives a bank feed that matches the same company's invoices, payments and payroll.

What you get

Plaid-shaped accounts, balances and transactions for the company's operating and payroll accounts — deposits, ACH, card spend, transfers — with realistic descriptions and timing. Reads are POST, like the real API: POST …/native/plaid/transactions/get with your Fictix project key in X-API-Key.

Coherent by construction

Every bank line has a cause elsewhere: a deposit is a Stripe payment, a debit is a vendor bill paid in QuickBooks, a run matches Gusto payroll. This is what makes real bank reconciliation and cash-flow features testable instead of hand-waved.

Reconcileone event → three systems
CANONICAL EVENTAcme Corp · +$8,500STStripecharge ch_3Pq$0QBQuickBooksInvoice 1042$0PLBank · Plaiddeposit ****4821$0
·Projecting one event…

Plant the bank-side traps

A deposit with no match in the books, a duplicate ACH, a bank item left open at month-end — plant them and measure detection. Advance the clock whenever you want fresh bank activity.

Start with a snapshot. Make it live when you're ready.
Generate your first company →

Questions

How is this better than Plaid's sandbox?

Plaid's sandbox accounts are isolated. Fictix's bank feed belongs to a whole company, so every transaction has a matching cause in accounting, payments or payroll.

Can I test bank reconciliation end to end?

Yes — deposits map to customer payments, debits to paid bills, and runs to payroll, so reconciliation logic is tested against coherent data, not guesses.

RELATED

→ Synthetic Stripe test data→ QuickBooks test data→ A sandbox alternative under $20k